Out West, where things are a bit more open, its not uncommon to see skiers on skis much taller than themselves. SE. Still have questions? How do these skis compare for those conditions? Looking for a ski to take to Colorado several time a season for a mix of groomer and off piste skiing. You will not loose any short turn capability with this length, as it is very approachable and use friendly for a wide variety of skiers, terrain and snow conditions. Also on the 178, Phil McGrory wished for a longer pair (186) but that didn't stop some high scores from popping up on his sheet. HI Gregg! For length there are two ways you could go, longer for more stability, and shorter for more maneuverability. I am looking for a powder ski that is easy to use for when we get dumps in the midwest as well as trips west. If youre staying mainly on the groomed trails here in NE, Id go with the Salomon. My favorite runs are the rare groomed black diamonds, but I will also ski ungroomed black and double-black when the snow is good. Great ski choice! I ski blue and black and dont mind steeps but will not ski any moguls past blue. I would have to go longer 164 if I go with the Blizzard and I could go either way (156 or 164) if I went with the Rossignol. Id go with the 156 if youre comfortable with the 158 Savor, but if youre looking for more stability and progress, go 164. The Kore is more in line with the Escaper in terms of weight, but a bit stiffer like the Rustler. SE. Here in the Eastern townships Quebec our hills get pretty icy, so looking for a ski that will be great for the climb (most important), but handle well on a descent that might be a little bumpy and icy. I could go to an 86 or 88 but want a 1 ski quiver for OS powder trips. Recommended will make the ski more turny and a bit slower, which some skiers equate to being more playful. For your stats and application, Id look to the low 170s for length. Other hints that you're looking at the Mondo Point and not the BSL would be if it looks something like "270/275" or if the number is found on the bottom of the boot. Sometimes you just need to speak to a expert, so if you're still having trouble picking a size, please give us a call at (877) 812-6710. Looking for a ski to ski hard w/ my friends on our yearly west coast trips. Preference: Finally, theres preference. I have enjoyed those skis but find them challenging to carve in tight spaces. This would be a great ski for you. While many skiers loved the Sky and its maneuverable and quick-turning nature, it did lack a bit at speed due to the extra-light tips and tails. My current skis are about 20 years old so time for an upgrade! Hi David! While youll still need a final adjustment done before you can ski, providing us with your boot sole length is absolutely crucial if youd like us to send your skis pre-mounted with your bindings. At your age, height, weight and improving ski ability, we would agree. Hi Russell! Your height puts you in the 172 while your weight and need for speed are in the 178 range. Moving the rental binding back one click helped a bit. Jeff Neagle skied the 178 cm length Escaper and found that the strengths were more in the quickness and maneuverability direction versus the strength and stability. If youre looking for a more stout feeling underfoot, Id lean to the QST. I was wondering if the 178 will be too long for him? For a Marker Griffon binding, Id put a 100 on it. Hi Steven! I tend to ski very fast on blue groomers but slow it down on blacks to avoid going too fast to stop. When the groomers are all clumpy, lumpy and bumpy, I find these skis difficult to use. I enjoy skiing everything the mountain has to offer. Much better edge grip. If hes 6 next year, Id go with the 178. SE. We're looking for your Mondo Point size, and the conversion is easy! I want to purchase my first set of skis, but unsure if these are the right ones. Im skiing in Idaho. Hes an intermediate to upper intermediate skier. I would prioritize carving ability and downhill speed over powder. TIA. thx. They are wide so they do well in soft snow and they are super heavy and relatively flat so they RIP on groomers (Ive clocked 60+ mph on Strava a few times) but they also take a lot of energy to shut down and are tough to swing around in tight trees and bumps. HI Chuck! Im 29, 5ft10, 77kg and started skiing 4 years ago. SE. Have fun! Im wondering about the difference in the mount points on the ski. Hes 59 going on 6 by next season probably. I would rather work harder in powder for the right carving/downhill ski. SE. He's not the only one picking up on that effort to reward ration. The Escaper is a great new offering, hoping to take over where the Sky left off, but also add some new details and things to like of its own. Youll see a huge improvement in crud and chop with the Escaper, and the good news is that theyre not too demanding, so youll be able to handle them quite well. Do you recommend purchasing a bit long on the Escapers, like on the Skys? Then parabolic shapes came along. I ski a mix of on and off piste. 28.5). Looking for Some Guidance? With a 19-meter turn radius, a full wood core and the Blackops adventure attitude, the Escaper might not seem as cool as the Senders or Holyshreds of the Rossignol world, but they're going to find a good following with a wide variety of skiers, and that's just how we like it. I ski about 7 to 10 days a year and learned to ski back east 30 years ago and always had an all-mountain ski. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. Ive demod these twice at my PNW resort (wet snow, rare pow) and am interested in picking them up in a 172 but was surprised they had me on a mans ski! HiI am trying to pick a good size of Escaper they seem to tick all the boxes Im after in a ski. Would be a better match for you in the 178cm length. With a great shape for any and all snow conditions, the skis are equally at home in fresh powder as they are on firm groomers. Have been skiing 1-2 weeks/year for 50+ years primarily in the east. The Volkl Rise Beyond would be an ideal choice for a 50/50 resort/skinning ski. Hi Brian! Beginner: Chances are youll know if this is you. You get a nice energetic feel out of it when linking turns and you don't have to give it a lot of skier input to achieve that, which is going to make it a favorite among intermediates and less-aggressive skiers. My sin 7 is a 172cm with 98 under foot. Nothing crazy. Advanced skier who skis out West at Whistler. Thanks for your reply! At 94 mm underfoot and with a gradual tip rocker profile, the ski has good flotation in softer snow but when the ski is on edge, the tip profile provides solid edge contact." Have fun! Not as strong a powder skier due to lack of practice. That said, the QST has more rocker and a shorter turn radius, so it feels nimble and agile like a lighter ski. I believe the Sheeva is available in a 159, if thats of interest. I wanted to grow into something and classify myself as a true intermediate when I skied more often. Phil states that "the new Blackops Escaper from Rossignol is a solid all-mountain ski that is playful and forgiving. For resort skis, theyre on the light side, and I dont think theyre too heavy for a dedicated tourer, especially if youre getting a shorter length like the 156. So..what size do you recommend? Youre that good at skiing. Help! Skill wise, youll be able to control your speed with snowplowing, wedging, or forming a pizza. I would now be more beginner/intermediate. Thanks in advance for your feedback. I am 63 225 lbs and am between these skis and the elon ripstick 88s. I want a good carver, but I love trees and powder when possible. SE. I do a lot of skiing in Colorado and Utah so a decent amount of powder. I am replacing 20 year old K2 skis. Stable enough for hardpack days on groomers but also playful and nimble enough for off-trail skiing. Im an athletic, strong intermediate 54 and 140lbs. As I will be making first steps in touring, I am thinking of a frame binding like Marker Baron/Tour EPF but is it worth to invest in such old technology? For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The more rockered escaper releases turns sooner and has a shorter effective edge making it maneuverable and easy to swing around and pivot. On the other hand, as I am seeking downhill performance, taking a Shift or Duke PT would it do the job? There are numerous ski choices including some I have not mentioned. If you love trees, the Escaper is the way to go. Also love the Top 5 Fridays! I plan on getting the 21 Escapers as a versatile ski to start transitioning from groomers to off-piste. They're a lot of ski, but are forgiving so it makes sense." Have fun! I just dont want to invest and have him grow out of them in a year. I am 41, 510 and 245 and havent skied in 15 years, but am getting back into it. Skiing in Park City mostly. Looking for a ski in the 90s range to ski groomers & some trees, and challenge on the blacks. I think this is the ski I am looking for, but would look at anything else you might recommend. I dont have the same recommendation with the Escaper as the Sky. He, too, was on the 178 and noted it was a good length for him. A shorter length will also be ideal for teaching as the less ski to get in the way the better, and you want to be as nimble as possible. But I fear that they might be too long to have fun with short turns on steep slopes, which is why i am also considering 172. Is 178 about the right length for me here? Its not the widest ski out there, but at 94 mm underfoot, its got more than enough for your run of the mill snow day. I am considering Rossi Blackops Escaper so I can keep up with my buddy when I go to Whistler. Blues, blacks if not too choppy, a few bumps but mostly frontside. Then rocker technology came along, and, long story short, theres way more room for preference and interpretation than ever before. If the pole is too long, then your forearm will be angled slightly up. Would you recommend these? The Escaper model in the Blackops line basically takes the place of the Sky 7, offering a bit of a narrower ski that has the same overall character, but with some new Blackops freeride twists. Have fun! So fun and intuitive, I think thats a great ski choice in the right length. 15 year skier, first ski purchase. Hi I have had 2 pairs of Experience 88s in a size 163. While I was impressed with both for sure, I think the QST holds a slightly more special place in my heart for 50/50 skiing. A lot of groomers these days with my son. Steve is in agreement with Jeff, stating that the Escaper is a "great upgrade from the Sin/Sky 7 skis. Ok, so maybe not the best, but you certainly could be a contendah, kid. I am on the West Coast of Canada and can ski in the interior too. HI Carli! At your stats and ability level, 172cm all the way for length. Im 43, 510 175lbs advanced intermediate splitting equal time between east and west about 70% black groomers 30% other. The -2 cm also says directional next to it. If you're holding the right size pole, you'll notice that your elbow forms a perfect 90 degree angle between your bicep and forearm. As I am not planning to push myself to the limits neither on groomers, nor in backcountry (trying to ride at 90-ish% of my capabilities) I found this ski would be a good choice to use on groomers and backcountry alike. Lots of fun stuff going on with the new Blackops line. Have fun! HI Ross! Hi Mike! The bad news, is that it can be a bit more difficult to do- but thats why were here. Steve Sulin also scored mostly 4's for the Escaper, with a lone 5 for overall impression. SE, Did forget to ask about the Head Kore 93s or 99s. Id say Im a upper level Intermediate, Ill do some blacks and a lot of blues, I enjoy just being outside and going on nice trails, not trying to break any speed records. Id look to the 183 in that ski for you. Advanced intermediate skier here who goes about 10 So its either going to be the 178 or the 186 with the 186 also carrying more speed. Love watching your ski reviews I have probably learned to much. Escaper seems to be a good choice. Given a choice Ill always explore off piste rather than the groomers. SE, Im 63 , 185lbs, advanced skiier(. At your stats, you will need the largest length offered at 187cm. Im also looking at the Salomon QST 98. For example, East Coast skiers may have visions of skiing wide open powder fields, but the reality is that 9/10 theyll have to navigate tight trees before finding their 100 yard straight shot of glory. Have fun! Im an intermediate to advanced skier, mostly skiing blues and blacks in the Rockies with 50% of my time on groomers and 50% on tree runs. Andrew, 100% in the Rockies but moving to the East Coast next summer. On the slightly narrower side, the Rossignol Experience 84 is more of an all-mountain upgrade from your R2s. Im looking for a new pair of skis this year, with more of an all mountain feel for powder. So you can measure yourself, or you can just check out our handy-dandy chart below. Im 56 and 165lbs. powder. Some certainly will, but if off-trail skiing becomes your preference, chances are youve graduated to the next level. We have had a lot of positive feedback on the Escaper these past few years, and its all warranted. I would say I am a true intermediate skiier but am in it for the long run in terms of a purchase.
Eufy Floodlight Camera Sd Card, Industrial Glycol Chiller, 24 Ft Round Pool Liner - 30 Gauge, Raspberry Pi Based Reader For Blind Github, Topdon Phoenix Elite Vs Plus, Santa Fe Dehumidifier Dealers Near Me, Summer Adventure Motorcycle Jacket, Best Site To Book Hotels In London, The International Handbook Of Collaborative Learning Pdf, Boss Rc-500 Alternative,
